Pathogenetic features of the influence of COVID-19 on morphological changes of sperm
https://doi.org/10.34680/2076-8052.2021.1(122).50-53
Abstract
A study was carried out on the change in sperm fertility in 73 men included in the in vitro fertilization program with preliminary indicators of normospermia depending on infection during COVID-19 quarantine. Prior to quarantine, all study participants had a PCR test for COVID-19 negative. When a second study was carried out after quarantine, with negative results of the PCR test, Ig G was detected in 38 of 73, with negative results for IgM to COVID-19. With this in mind, the study participants were divided into 2 groups. Group I included 35 men in whom antibodies to COVID-19 were not detected in the blood during the ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) test. Group II consisted of 38 men in whom Ig G to COVID-19 was detected upon repeated blood tests. Considering that 4 of them had azoospermia after acute respiratory syndrome with COVID-19 complicated by respiratory failure, they were not considered. Comparative analysis of spermogram indices after quarantine showed that in group II, against the background of a general tendency towards negative sperm parameters that determine its fertility, the total number of sperm in the test material (P <0.05) significantly decreased, which, in combination with a significant decrease in progressively motile (P <0.05) and the total number of motile spermatozoa (P <0.05), both in relation to the indicators before quarantine and the results of sperm analysis in group I intact according to COVID-19, Thus, infection with COVID-19 even in an asymptomatic or subclinical study that does not require seeking medical attention, it is a pathogenetically significant factor in reducing male fertility. It is advisable to continue research in this direction. Further study of the issue is still required.
About the Authors
I. A. MelnikovKazakhstan
Almaty
S. A. Salekhov
Russian Federation
Veliky Novgorod
S. N. Gaidukov
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
R. V. Bezrukov
Kazakhstan
Almaty
M. Karimaly kyzy
Kyrgyzstan
Bishkek
References
1. Khalili M.A., Leisegang K., Majzoub A. et al. Male Fertility and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review of the Literature. World J. Mens Health, 2020, vol. 38(4), pp. 506520. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200134
2. Pan F., Xiao X., Guo J. et al. No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in semen of males recovering from COVID-19. Fertil Steril., 2020, vol.113, pp.1135–1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.024.
3. 3. Nora H., Philippos E., Marcel A. et al. Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 in human semen-a cohort study. Fertil Steril., 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.05.028.
4. Salekhov S.A., Korabel'nikova I.A., Gaydukov S.N. i dr. Patoge-neticheskie osobennosti nizkoy effektivnosti vnutrimatochnoy inseminatsii [Pathogenetic significance of uterine tone on the effectiveness of intrauterine insemination]. International journal of medicine and psychology, 2020, v.3, no.2, p. 130-136.
5. Nieschlag E., Behre H.M. Male reproductive health and dysfunction. Chap. 5, Berlin, Springer Verlag, pp. 83-87.
6. Tournaye H. Male factor infertility and ART. Asian J. Androl., 2012, vol.14(1), pp.103-108. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.65.
7. Kirilenko E.A., Onopko V.F. Okislitel'nyy stress i muzhskaya fertil'nost': sovremennyy vzglyad na problem [Oxidative stress and male fertility: modern view on the problem]. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. East Siberian Biomedical Journal, 2017, vol. 2, no.2 (114), pp.102-108.
8. Dutta S., Majzoub A., Agarwal A. Oxidative stress and sperm function: a systematic review on evaluation and management. Arab J. Urol., 2019, vol.17(2), pp. 87–97. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1599624.
9. Kidun K.A., Ugol'nik T.S. Mitokhondrial'naya disfunktsiya spermatozoidov v patogeneze patospermiy pri okislitel'nom stresse (obzor literatury) [Mitochondrial sperm dysfunction in the pathogenesis of pathospermia under oxidative stress (literature review)]. Problemy zdorov'ya i ekologii, 2017, no. 2(36), pp. 20-24.
10. Ma L., Xie W., Li D. et al. Effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection upon male gonadal function: a single center-based study. medRxiv, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.21.20037267.
11. Delgado-Roche L., Mesta F. Oxidative stress as key player in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection. Arch Med Res. 2020, vol.1, pp. 384–387. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.04.019.
12. Hoffmann M., Kleine-Weber H., Schroeder S. et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell, 2020, vol. 181, pp. 271–280.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052.
13. Dutta, S., Sengupta, P. SARS-CoV-2 and Male Infertility: Possible Multifaceted Pathology. Reprod. Sci., 2020. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00261-z.
14. World Health Organization. WHO Manual for the Standardized Investigation and Diagnosis of the Infertile Couple. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 102.
15. Mel'nikov I.A., S.A. Salekhov, Korabel'nikova I.A. Patogeneticheskoe znachenie tonusa matki na effektivnost' vnutrimatochnoy inseminatsii [Pathogenetic significance of the uterine tonus on the effectiveness of intrauterine insemination]. International journal of medicine and psychology / Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal meditsiny i psikhologii, 2020, vol.3, no.3, pp.136-141.
Review
For citations:
Melnikov I.A., Salekhov S.A., Gaidukov S.N., Bezrukov R.V., Karimaly kyzy M. Pathogenetic features of the influence of COVID-19 on morphological changes of sperm. Title in english. 2021;(1(122)):50-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34680/2076-8052.2021.1(122).50-53