Preview

Title in english

Advanced search

Assessment of quality of life in patients with pelvic organ prolapse after prosthetic reconstruction via vaginal access

https://doi.org/10.34680/2076-8052.2021.3(124).99-102

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of the treatment of 307 patients who underwent surgery for pelvic prolapse in the Coloproctology department of Surgut District Clinical Hospital in 2013—2019 was performed. The results obtained suggest that clinical manifestations of pelvic prolapse significantly reduce the quality of life (by an average of 55.0 ± 10.8%). At the same time, the symptoms of urinary dysfunction in patients have the most evident negative impact on their quality of life. Surgery of pelvic prolapse was performed using Pelvix and Urosling-1 mesh implants (Lintex, Russia), Prolift™ (Johnson & Johnson Company, USA). Control examinations were done from 3 to 12 months after surgery. A validated Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 questionnaire was used for comparative assessment of quality of life. The analysis reliably demonstrated a 43.1% improvement in quality of life in patients after prosthetic reconstruction performed via vaginal access with use of meshes for pelvic prolapse.

About the Authors

A. Y. Ilkanich
Сургутский государственный университет
Russian Federation


A. S. Matveeva
Сургутский государственный университет
Russian Federation


Z. N. Lopatskaya
Сургутский государственный университет
Russian Federation


References

1. Aliev E.A., Akhmedova E.V. Prolaps tazovykh organov (obzor literatury). Koloproktologiya, 2016, no.2, pp.42-47.

2. La Rosa V.L., Ciebiera M., Lin L.T., et al. Multidisciplinary management of women with pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms. A clinical and psychological overview. Prz Menopauzalny, 2019, vol.18(3), pp.184-190.

3. Ko K.J., Lee K.S. Current surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: Strategies for the improvement of surgical outcomes. Investig Clin Urol., 2019, vol.60(6), pp.413-424.

4. Jeon M.J. Surgical decision making for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based approach. Obstet Gynecol Sci., 2019, vol.62(5), pp.307-312.

5. Good M.M., Solomon E.R. Pelvic Floor Disorders. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am., 2019, vol.46(3), pp.527-540.

6. Weintraub A.Y., Glinter H., Marcus-Braun N. Narrative review of the epidemiology, diagnosis and pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Braz J Urol., 2020, v.46(1), pp.5-14.

7. Kolesnikova S.N., Dubinskaya E.D. , Babicheva I.A. Vliyanie rannikh form prolapsa tazovykh organov na kachestvo zhizni zhenshchin reproduktivnogo vozrasta [Impact of early forms of pelvic organ prolapse on the quality of life of women of reproductive age]. Akademicheskiy zhurnal Zapadnoy Sibiri, 2016, vol.12, no.1, pp.65-67.

8. Gasparov A.S. et al. Rannie formy prolapsa tazovykh organov: klinicheskaya znachimost', etiologiya i patogenez [ Early forms of pelvic organ prolapse: clinical significance, etiology and pathogenesis]. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii, 2016, vol.15 (2), pp.43-51.

9. Frigerio M., Manodoro S., Cola A., et al. Detrusor underactivity in pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J., 2018, vol.29(8), pp.1111-1116.

10. Stadnicka G., Łepecka-Klusek C., Pilewska-Kozak A., Jakiel G. Psychosocial problems of women with stress urinary incontinence. Ann Agric Environ Med., 2015, vol.22(3), pp.499-503.

11. Ghetti C., Lowder J.L., Ellison R. et al. Depressive symptoms in women seeking surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J., 2010, vol.21(7), pp.855-60.

12. Ai F., Deng M., Mao M. et al. Depressive symptoms screening in postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Menopause, 2018, v.25(3), p.314-319.

13. Larouche M., Brotto L.A., Koenig N.A. et al. Depression, Anxiety, and Pelvic Floor Symptoms Before and After Surgery for Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg., 2020, vol.26(1), pp.67-72.

14. Ghetti C., Lee M., Oliphant S. et al. Sleep quality in women seeking care for pelvic organ prolapse. Maturitas, 2015, vol.80(2), pp.155-61.

15. Il'kanich A.Ya., Matveeva A.S., Vishnyakova I.A., Lobanova Yu.S., Lopatskaya Zh.N. Metod khirurgicheskogo lecheniya rektotsele, sochetannogo s apikal'nym prolapsom. Vestnik SurGU. Meditsina, 2020, vol.(1), pp.30-38.

16. Il'kanich A.Ya., Darvin V.V., Aliev F.Sh., Matveeva A.S., Lopatskaya Zh.N. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie bol'nykh s prolapsom tazovykh organov. Koloproktologiya, 2018, vol.(3), pp.44-49.

17. Barber M.D., Walters R.C., Bump R.C. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7) // Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005. Vol. 193(1). P.103-113.


Review

For citations:


Ilkanich A.Y., Matveeva A.S., Lopatskaya Z.N. Assessment of quality of life in patients with pelvic organ prolapse after prosthetic reconstruction via vaginal access. Title in english. 2021;(3(124)):99-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34680/2076-8052.2021.3(124).99-102

Views: 46


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2076-8052 (Print)