Epistasis of hemostasis and folate cycle genes in fetal growth restriction and early-onset preeclampsia
https://doi.org/10.34680/2076-8052.2025.4(142).642-658
Abstract
To investigate the frequency of single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes of the hemostatic system and the folate cycle, as well as their intergenic interactions, in patients with antenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction with and without clinical manifestations of preeclampsia. The study included 255 delivery records. The first (control) group consisted of 70 cases of normal deliveries in conditionally healthy pregnant women. The second group comprised 90 cases of deliveries complicated by fetal growth restriction without clinical signs of preeclampsia. The third group included 95 cases of deliveries with diagnosed early–onset preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction at a gestational age of 20–34 weeks. In patients from all groups, genetic polymorphisms associated with the hemostatic system and folate metabolism were determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Epistasis analysis was performed using the Generalized Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction (GMDR) v. 0,7 method. Predictive models of varying complexity were constructed. For the group with fetal growth restriction without clinical preeclampsia, the three-locus model. For the group with fetal growth restriction accompanied by preeclampsia, the most effective was the five–locus model. Specific high-risk genotypic profiles were identified for each form of the pathology. Distinct variants of the genetic architecture underlying isolated fetal growth restriction and fetal growth restriction associated with preeclampsia were identified. Combined analysis of polymorphisms in hemostasis- and folate cycle related genes enables early prediction and risk stratification of placental disorders.
About the Authors
L. D. BelotserkovtsevaРоссия
Surgut
L. V. Kovalenko
Россия
Surgut
I. I. Mordovina
Россия
Surgut
T. A. Sinyukova
Россия
Surgut
I. A. Kudrinskikh
Россия
Surgut
References
1. Benítez M. A., Vargas P. M., Manzanares G. S. Ultrasound and biochemical first trimester markers as predictive factors for intrauterine growth restriction // Obstetrics & gynecology cases–review. 2017. 4 (2). 109. DOI: 10.23937/2377-9004/1410109
2. Albu A. R., Anca A. F., Horhoianu V. V., Horhoianu I. A. Predictive factors for intrauterine growth restriction // Journal of medicine and life. 2014. 7 (2). 165–171.
3. Parker S. E. Epidemiology of ischemic placental disease: a focus on preterm gestations // Seminars in perinatology. 2014. 38 (3). 133–138. DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2014.03.004
4. Levine T. A., Grunau R. E., McAuliffe F. M., Pinnamaneni R., Foran A., Alderdice F. A.Early childhood neurodevelopment after intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review // Pediatrics. 2015. 135 (1). 126–141. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-1143
5. Kiserud T., Benachi A., Hecher K., Perez R. G., Carvalho J., Piaggio G., Platt L. D. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application // American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018. 218 (2S). S619–S629. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.010
6. Guerby P., Bujold E. Early detection and prevention of intrauterine growth restriction and its consequences // JAMA Pediatrics. 2020. 174 (8). 749–750. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1106
7. Staff A. C. The two-stage placental model of preeclampsia: an update // Journal of reproductive immunology. 2019. 134–135. 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2019.07.004
8. Ashraf U. M., Hall D. L., Rawls A. Z., Alexander B. T. Epigenetic processes during preeclampsia and effects on fetal development and chronic health // Clinical science. 2021. 135 (19). 2307–2327. DOI: 10.1042/CS20190070
9. Belotserkovtseva L. D., Telitsyn D. P., Kovalenko L. V., Kasparova A. E., Mordovina I. I. Genetic predictors of early- and late-onset preeclampsia. Pathogenetic approaches to the treatment of preeclampsia // Vestnik of Surgut State University. Medicine. 2019. 4 (42). 79–86. DOI: 10.34822/2304-9448-2019-4-79-86 (In Russian).
10. Miller E. C., Wilczek A., Bello N. A., Tom S., Wapner R., Suh Y. Pregnancy, preeclampsia and maternal aging: from epidemiology to functional genomics // Ageing research reviews. 2022. 73. 101535. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101535
11. Khot V., Kale A., Joshi A., Chavan-Gautam P., Joshi S. Expression of genes encoding enzymes involved in the one carbon cycle in rat placenta is determined by maternal micronutrients (folic acid, vitamin B12) and omega-3 fatty acids // BioMed research international. 2014. 613078. DOI: 10.1155/2014/613078
12. Meena S., Gaikwad H. S., Nath B. Plasma homocysteine, folic acid and vitamin B12 in abruptio placentae: a cross-sectional study of their role and feto-maternal outcome // Cureus. 2023. 15 (3). e35664. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35664
13. Efremova O., Ponomarenko I., Churnosov M. Role of intergenic interactions among folate cycle genes in the development of fetal growth retardation // Reproductive and Developmental Medicine. 2023. 7 (1). 32–37. DOI: 10.1097/RD9.0000000000000013
14. Fetal growth restriction requiring medical care for the mother (fetal growth restriction): Clinical guidelines approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2022. URL: https://legalacts.ru/doc/klinicheskie-rekomendatsii-nedostatochnyi rost-ploda-trebuiushchii-predostavlenija-meditsinskoi-pomoshchi/ (Accessed: 10.04.2025).) (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Belotserkovtseva L.D., Kovalenko L.V., Mordovina I.I., Sinyukova T.A., Kudrinskikh I.A. Epistasis of hemostasis and folate cycle genes in fetal growth restriction and early-onset preeclampsia. Vestnik of Novgorod State University. 2025;(4(142)):642-658. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34680/2076-8052.2025.4(142).642-658
JATS XML
