Suture failure after abdominal delivery: problems and solutions (literature review)
https://doi.org/10.34680/2076-8052.2023.2(131).322-337
Abstract
In many countries, there has recently been an increase in the frequency of cesarean section (C-section). In developed countries, the C-section rate has reached 30%; in Russia, it varies from 3 to 47,4%. Recent studies have also shown an increase in postoperative complications associated with C-section. This research aims to assess the disclosure of the problem of suture (scar) failure after C-section and to investigate the role of common clinical risk factors and laboratory markers in the development of suture failure associated with C-sections. This study expands our understanding of the actual diagnostics of this pathology. The authors introduce a variant of solving the problem of reducing the risk of postoperative complications in women after C-sections in the form of developing a computer program for predicting the development of this pathology.
About the Authors
D. V. Starikova
Kirov State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Starikova D. V.,
Kirov.
N. V. Bogacheva
Kirov State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Bogacheva N. V.,
Kirov.
E. G. Zaitseva
LLC “Medical center "Za Rozhdeniye"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zaitseva E. G.,
Kirov.
References
1. Savelyeva G. M., Karaganova E. Ya. Kesarevo secheniye [Cesarean section] // Obstetrics and gynecology: news, opinions, training. 2015. 2. 53-60.
2. Belokrinitskaya T. E., Frolova N. I. Profilaktika septicheskikh oslozhneniy v akusherstve: rekomendatsii Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Vsemirnoy organizatsii zdravookhraneniya 2015 g. [Prevention of septic complications in obstetrics: recommendations of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation and the World Health Organization 2015] // Russian Bulletin of obstetrician-gynecologist. 2016. 3. 79-84. DOI: 10.17116/rosakush201616379-84
3. Sen S., Malik S., Salhan S. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section // International Journal of Gynecology & ObstetricsInt. 2004. 87(3). 215-219. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.07.023
4. Shchukina N. A., Blaginina E. I., Barinova I. V. Prichiny formirovaniya i metody profilaktiki nesostoyatel'nogo rubtsa na matke posle kesareva secheniya [Reasons for the formation and methods of prevention of an untenable scar on the uterus after cesarean section] // Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2015. 37. 85-92. DOI: 10.18786/2072-0505-2015-37-85-92
5. Poidevin L. Caesarean section scar safety // British Medical Journal.1959. 21(2). 1058-1061. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5159.1058
6. Sparic R., Mirkovic R., Ravilic U., Janjic T. Obstetric complications of placenta previa percreta // Vojnosanitetski pregled. Military-Medical and Pharmaceutical Review, 2014. 71(12). 1163-1166. DOI : DOI: 10.2298/vsp1412163s
7. Eller A. G., Porter T. F., Soisson P., Silver R. M. Optimal Management Strategies for Placenta Accreta // BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2009. 116(5). 648-654. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02037.x
8. Jastrow N., Chaillet N., Roberge S., Morency A.-M., Lacasse Y., Bujold T. J. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review // Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2010. 32(4). 321-327. DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34475-9
9. Naji O., Daemen A., Abdallah Y., Smith A., Pexsters A., Stalder S., Saso S., Ghaem-Maghami A., McIndoe D., Timmerman D., Bourne T. OC26.05: Longitudinal measurements of Caesarean section scar size and residual myometrial thickness in pregnancy as predictors of scar appearance at repeat Caesarean delivery // Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2011. 38(S1). 38-48. DOI: 10.1002/uog.9236
10. Naji O., Daemen A., Smith A., Abdallah Y., Saso S., Stalder C., Sayasneh A., McIndoe A., Ghaem-Maghami S., Timmerman D., Bourne T. O. Changes in Cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study // Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2012. 41(5). 556-562. DOI: 10.1002/uog.12334
11. Ryzhkov V. V., Khazhbiev A. A. Profilaktika gnoyno-septicheskikh oslozhneniy posle operatsii kesareva secheniya [Prevention of purulent-septic complications after cesarean section surgery] // Tavrichesky Medico-Biological Bulletin. 2017. 20(2-2). 190-197.
12. Ivashova O. N., Lebedeva O. P., Pakhomov S. P., Rudykh N. A., Seliverstova M. S. Antimikrobnyye peptidy v patogeneze infektsionnykh oslozhneniy v akusherstve i ginekologii [Antimicrobial peptides in the pathogenesis of infectious complications in obstetrics and gynecology] // Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases. 2014. 63(5). 73-81.
13. Bychkov I. V., Shamarin S. V., Bychkov V. I. Sostoyaniye fetoplatsentarnoy sistemy u zhenshchin s nepolnotsennym rubtsom na matke [The state of the fetoplacental system in women with an incomplete scar on the uterus] // Children's Medicine of the North-West. 2011. 2(3). 10-12.
14. Mukhlynina I. A., Tn A. R., Yakushev A. M. nfektsionnyye oslozhneniya kesareva secheniya [Infectious complications of cesarean section] // Interdisciplinary research: past experience, present opportunities, future strategies. 2021. 4. 29-35.
15. Medzhidova D. R., Marshalov D. V., Petrenko A. P., Shifman E. M. Perioperatsionnyye i otdalennyye oslozhneniya pri kesarevom sechenii: sistematicheskiy obzor [Perioperative and long-term complications in caesarean section: a systematic review] // Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2020. 16(1). 9-17.
16. Thurn L., Lindqvist G., Jakobsson M., Colmorn L. V., Klungsoyr K., Bjarnadottir R. I., Tapper A. M., Børdahl P. E., Gottvall K., Petersen K. B., Krebs L., Gissler M., Langhoff-Roos J., Källen K. Abnormally invasive placenta-prevalence, risk factors and antenatal suspicion: results from a large population-based pregnancy cohort study in the Nordic countries // BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2016. 123(8). 1348-1355. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13547
17. Evseeva M. P., Gustovarova T. A., Kirakosyan L. S. Fertil'nost' i menstrual'naya funktsiya posle organosokhranyayushchikh operatsiy v sovremennom akusherstve [Fertility and menstrual function after organ-preserving operations in modern obstetrics] // Smolensk Medical Almanac. 2019. 3. 49-53.
18. Krasnopolskaya K. V., Popov A. A., Chechneva M. A., Fedorov A. A., Ershov I. Yu. Pregravidarnaya metroplastika po povodu nesostoyatel'nogo rubtsa na matke posle kesareva secheniya: vliyaniye na yestestvennuyu fertil'nost' i rezul'taty EKO [Pregravidar metroplasty for an untenable scar on the uterus after cesarean section: influence on natural fertility and IVF results] // Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2015. 21(3). 56-62. DOI: 10.17116/repro201521356-62
19. Leshchishin Ya. M., Baranov A. I., Konovalov A. A., Solovenko S. S. Chastota vstrechayemosti i struktura gnoynykh oslozhneniy oblasti operativnogo vmeshatel'stva v neotlozhnoy khirurgii [Frequency of occurrence and structure of purulent complications in the field of surgical intervention in emergency surgery] // Acta Biomedica Scientifica (Bulletin of the East Siberian Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences). 2011. 4(80-2). 96-98.
20. Sepsis: klassifikatsiya, kliniko-diagnosticheskaya kontseptsiya i lecheniye: prakticheskoye rukovodstvo [Sepsis: classification, clinical and diagnostic concept and treatment: a practical guide]. Eds.: V.S. Savelyev, B.R. Gelfand. Moscow, Medical nformation Agency Publ., 2011. 352 p.
21. Mezhdunarodnaya klassifikatsiya bolezney desyatogo peresmotra MKB-10: kratkiy variant, osnovannyy na Mezhdunarodnoy statisticheskoy klassifikatsii bolezney i problem, svyazannykh so zdorov'yem, 10-go peresmotra, prinyatoy 43-yey Vsemirnoy Assambleyey Zdravookhraneniya [International Classification of Diseases of the tenth revision of ICD-10: a short version based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health-Related Problems of the 10th revision adopted by the 43rd World Health Assembly]. Moscow, 2020. 582 p. Available at: https://telemedai.ru/media/documents/202001_mkb-10_prinyatoj_43-ej_vsemirnoj_assambleej_zdravoohraneniya_0.pdf (Accessed: 15.10.2022).
22. Agarev A. E., Zdolnik T. D., Kovalenko M. S., Zotov V. V. Prognozirovaniye razvitiya infektsiy, svyazannykh s okazaniyem meditsinskoy pomoshchi, u rodil'nits [Prediction of the development of infections associated with the provision of medical care in maternity hospitals] // I. P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2017. 25(4). 565-574. DOI: 10.23888/PAVLOVJ20174565-574
23. Egorova A. T., Glebova T. K., Moiseenko D. A., Shaposhnikova E. V. Gnoyno-vospalitel'nyye oslozhneniya v akusherskoy praktike po materialam krayevoy klinicheskoy bol'nitsy g. Krasnoyarska [Purulent-inflammatory complications in obstetric practice based on the materials of the regional clinical hospital of Krasnoyarsk] // Siberian Medical Review. 2015. 4(94). 47-51.
24. Kamilova M. Ya., Kalandarova M. Kh., Dzhonmakhmadova P. A., Nazarova Ch. A., Nazarbekova Sh. A. Vestnik Akademii meditsinskikh nauk Tadzhikistana [The frequency of cesarean section and indicative perinatal smithness in a 3rd-level hospital] // Vestnik Akademii meditsinskikh nauk Tadzhikistana — Bulletin of the Academic Medical Sciences of Tajikistan. 2020. Vol. 10. 3(35). 259-264. DOI: 10.31712/2221-7355-2020-10-3-259-264
25. Korobkov N. A. Kliniko-bakteriologicheskaya kharakteristika poslerodovykh gnoyno-vospalitel'nykh zabolevaniy [Clinical and bacteriological characteristics of postpartum purulent-inflammatory diseases] // Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases. 2015. 64(4). 78-84. DOI: 10.17816/JOWD64478-84
26. Serov V. N., Sukhoi G. T., Baranov I. I., Pyregov A. V., Tyutyunnik V. L., Shmakov R. G. Neotlozhnyye sostoyaniya v akusherstve: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey [Urgent conditions in obstetrics: a guide for doctors]. Moscow, GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2011. 775 p.
27. Podgornaya A. V., Makhmutkhodzhaev A. S., Koch L. I., Mikheenko G. A., Yuryev S. Yu. Nespetsificheskiy immunitet vlagalishcha u beremennykh zhenshchin s retsidiviruyushchim bakterial'nym vaginozom [Nonspecific immunity of the vagina in pregnant women with recurrent bacterial vaginosis] // Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2017. 1. 14-19.
28. Mascarello К. С., Horta B. L., Silveira M. F. Maternal complications and cesarean section without indication: systematic review and meta-analysis // Revista de Saúde Pública. 2017. 51. 103-105. DOI: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051000389
29. Gritsyuk T. L., Zaporozhets T. S. Immunoprofilaktika i immunoterapiya gnoyno-septicheskikh oslozhneniy khirurgicheskikh vmeshatel'stv [Immunoprophylaxis and immunotherapy of purulent-septic complications of surgical interventions] // Far Eastern Medical Journal. 2006. 1. 116-120.
30. Kochetkov A. V., Gudilov M. S. Kliniko-laboratornaya diagnostika i monitoring gnoyno-septicheskikh oslozhneniy posle operatsiy na organakh bryushnoy polosti [Clinical and laboratory diagnostics and monitoring of purulent-septic complications after operations on abdominal organs] // Novosti Khirurgii. 2015. 23(1). 105-111. DOI: 10.18484/2305-0047.2015.1.105/
31. Tkachenko L. V., Uglova N. D., Sviridova N. I., Skladanovskaya T. V. Sovremennyy podkhod k lecheniyu vul'vovaginal'nykh infektsiy [A modern approach to the treatment of vulvovaginal infections] // Obstetrics and gynecology: news, opinions, training,2018. 4(22). 52-58. DOI: 10.24411/2303-9698-2018-14006
32. Septicheskiye oslozhneniya v akusherstve: klinicheskiye rekomendatsii [Septic complications in obstetrics: clinical recommendations]. Moscow, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2017. 59 p. Available at: https://www.medkirov.ru/docs/id/2622F0/$File.pdf (Accessed: 05.10.2022).
33. Posleoperatsionnyy rubets na matke, trebuyushchiy predostavleniya meditsinskoy pomoshchi materi vo vremya beremennosti, rodov i poslerodovom periode: klinicheskiye rekomendatsii [Postoperative scar on the uterus, requiring the provision of medical care to the mother during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period: clinical recommendations]. Moscow, Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2021. 40 p. Available at: https://roag-portal.ru/recommendations_obstetrics (Accessed: 13.12.2022).
34. Dabuzov A.S., Rajabova Sh.Sh. Nekotoryye immunologicheskiye pokazateli krovi pri peritonite posle kesareva secheniya [Some immunological blood parameters in peritonitis after cesarean section] // Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2015. 2-3. 210-211.
35. Blednov A. V. Osobennosti immunnogo statusa u bol'nykh s gnoyno-vospalitel'nymi zabolevaniyami [Features of the immune status in patients with purulent-inflammatory diseases] // Novosti Khirurgii. 2005. 13(14). 37-45.
36. Timakova V. P., Cherepnev G. V. Immunologicheskiye kriterii prognoza gnoyno-septicheskikh oslozhneniy v posleoperatsionnom periode [Immunological criteria for the prognosis of purulent-septic complications in the postoperative period] // Practical Medicine. 2011. 7(55). 122-124.
37. Lebedev A. T., Artemenko K. A., Samgin T. Yu. Osnovy mass-spektrometrii belkov i peptidov [Fundamentals of mass spectrometry of proteins and peptides]. Moscow, Tekhnosfera Publ., 2012. 181 p.
38. Priputnevich T. V., Melkumyan A. R. Mass-spektrometriya – novoye slovo v klinicheskoy mikrobiologii [Mass spectrometry – a new word in clinical microbiology]. Russian Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics. 2016. 61(12). 842-848. DOI: 10.18821/0869-2084-2016-61-12-842-848
39. Boronina L. G., Blinova S. M., Samatova E. V., Zhilin A. V. Etiologicheskaya struktura i antibiotikorezistentnost' osnovnykh vozbuditeley gnoyno-septicheskikh zabolevaniy rodil'nits i novorozhdennykh [Etiological structure and antibiotic resistance of the main pathogens of purulent-septic diseases of maternity and newborn] // Russian Medical Journal. 2016. 5. 336-339.
40. Korobkov N. A. Mikrobiologicheskaya diagnostika poslerodovogo endometrita [Microbiological diagnostics of postpartum endometritis] // Scientific notes of the Pavlov University.2013. 20(3). 57-60. DOI: 10.24884/1607-4181-2013-20-3-57-60
41. Rybalka A. N., Sulima A. N., Yakovchuk E. K., Dizha M. A. Khronicheskiy endometrit: puti resheniya problemy (obzor literatury) [Chronic endometritis: ways to solve the problem (literature review)] // Modern medicine: topical issues. 2016. 54-55. 14-23.
42. Budilovskaya O. V. Sovremennyye predstavleniya o laktobatsillakh vlagalishcha zhenshchin reproduktivnogo vozrasta [Modern ideas about lactobacilli of the vagina of women of reproductive age] // Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases. 2016. 65(4). 34-43. DOI: 10.17816/JOWD65434-43
43. Yarullina D. R., Fakhrullin R. F. Bakterii roda Lactobacillus: obshchaya kharakteristika i metody raboty s nimi : uchebno-metodicheskoye posobiye [Bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus: general characteristics and methods of working with them: educational and methodical manual]. Kazan, Kazan University Publ., 2014. 51 p.
44. PTsR v real'nom vremeni: novyye vozmozhnosti tekhnologii v reshenii reproduktivnykh problem: posobiye dlya vrachey [Real-time PCR: new possibilities of technology in solving reproductive problems: a manual for doctors]. Comps.: E. E. Baranova, E. I. Bateneva, I. S. Galkina, A. E. Donnikov, V. V. Zorina, L. V. Tumbinskaya, G. G. Shigorina. Moscow, DNK-Tekhnologiya Publ., 2017. 64 p.
45. Voroshilova E. S., Plotko E. E., Islamidi D. K., Kudryavtseva E. V., Kovalev V. V., Zornikov D. L., Petrov V. M. Mikrobiota vlagalishcha: vozmozhnosti korrektsii disbioticheskikh sostoyaniy: uchebnoye posobiye [Vaginal microbiota: possibilities of correction of dysbiotic conditions: textbook]. Ed. E. S. Voroshilova. Yekaterinburg, Ural State Medical University Publ., 2022. 160 p.
Review
For citations:
Starikova D.V., Bogacheva N.V., Zaitseva E.G. Suture failure after abdominal delivery: problems and solutions (literature review). Title in english. 2023;(2(131)):322-337. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34680/2076-8052.2023.2(131).322-337
Views:
93
Email this article 